Bug#792101: ITP: gogs -- Gogs is a self hosted service aiming to provide a similar set of features to gitlab and github.

[John Hackett]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Hackett <john+***@shockingly.eu>

* Package name : gogs
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : ***@gitea.io
* URL : https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Golang
Description : Gogs is a self hosted service aiming to provide a similar set of features to gitlab and github.

[Benjamin Drung]

Post by John Hackett
* Package name : gogs
* URL : https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea

Your URL points to gitea instead of gogs. Do you want to package gogs or
gitea. Please fix the URL in the former case or rename the package in
the latter case.
--
Benjamin Drung
System Developer
Debian & Ubuntu Developer

ProfitBricks GmbH
Greifswalder Str. 207
D - 10405 Berlin

Email: ***@profitbricks.com
URL: http://www.profitbricks.com

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin.
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 125506B.
GeschÀftsfÌhrer: Andreas Gauger, Achim Weiss.

[PICCORO McKAY Lenz]

Debian packaging pretend to made a simple gogs virtual package provided by
gitea..

the gitea package roadmap pretend to separate from gogs, and are complety
different..

gogs are focused on simplicity, no new features and only security fixeds
gitea are focused on new features and changes too many ..

the gitea package can be a pain to mantain in debian...

Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

[Michael Lustfield]

It seems I'm still the only person interested in working on gitea packaging.
Bummer, I almost got hopeful once or twice.

There are a lot of things still pending, a few packages that will be an
exceptional time sink, as well as other obvious packaging flaws, and a weird
working directory issue within gitea.

Despite the package being unsuitable for release, I popped up a repository to
make my current work available for playing with.


Work In Progress (Demo):
https://people.debian.org/~mtecknology/ppa/README

[Raoul]

Post by Michael Lustfield
It seems I'm still the only person interested in working on gitea
packaging.

Of course not, I'm very interested to get a gitea package in Debian.
Unfortunately I can not really help you with the technical issues.

I closely followed your WIP status page at [1] until it disappeared
a few days ago.

[1] https://github.com/MTecknology/gitea-wip/blob/master/work_in_progress

Post by Michael Lustfield
Despite the package being unsuitable for release, I popped up a repository to
make my current work available for playing with.

Thanks. I shall test this as soon as I find the time.

[Stefan Monnier]

Just to be clear, this is not in Debian main, it is in contrib.

Thank you very much for that. Happily running it on my BananaPi here now.
What is its status exactly: I see "contrib" described as "free but
depending on non-free code", but it's not clear exactly what non-free
code it relies on.

I see also that it's now in "unstable" (tho not yet in "testing",
apparently) and compiled for various architectures including the armhf
I'm using, which is great. Until those JS packaging issues are
resolved, do you plan on keeping the package uptodate on
a regular basis?


Stefan