Discussion:
Bug#1098529: anymarkup: FTBFS: E assert 2 == 0
Add Reply
Santiago Vila
2025-03-02 10:00:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
retitle 1098529 anymarkup: will FTBFS with click 8.2
thanks
I cannot reproduce the bug in a freshly created unstable chroot, so I'm lowering the
severity for the time being. Please let me know how to reproduce the issue.
The issue was reproducible at the date I reported it, so I used debbisect
to see why it does not fail anymore:

bisection finished successfully
last bad timestamp: 20250228T151043Z
first good timestamp: 20250228T210243Z
the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp:
apt 2.9.30 -> 2.9.31
libapt-pkg7.0:amd64 2.9.30 -> 2.9.31
python3-click 8.2.0-1 -> 8.2.0+0.really.8.1.8-1

AFAIK, click 8.2.0 was known to break too many packages so it was
reverted for trixie.

I'm keeping the bug open (with the lower severity) because this issue
will be back eventually.

Thanks.
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-03-02 10:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hi Santiago,
Post by Santiago Vila
retitle 1098529 anymarkup: will FTBFS with click 8.2
thanks
I cannot reproduce the bug in a freshly created unstable chroot, so I'm lowering the
severity for the time being. Please let me know how to reproduce the issue.
The issue was reproducible at the date I reported it, so I used debbisect
bisection finished successfully
last bad timestamp: 20250228T151043Z
first good timestamp: 20250228T210243Z
apt 2.9.30 -> 2.9.31
libapt-pkg7.0:amd64 2.9.30 -> 2.9.31
python3-click 8.2.0-1 -> 8.2.0+0.really.8.1.8-1
AFAIK, click 8.2.0 was known to break too many packages so it was
reverted for trixie.
Thanks for the bisect, this information is very useful. It might be a good idea
to forward this bug report to anymarkup upstream.
Post by Santiago Vila
I'm keeping the bug open (with the lower severity) because this issue
will be back eventually.
I agree.

Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Loading...